While vaping has become a popular method of consuming medical marijuana, it's important to recognize that it's not the same as traditional methods such as smoking a joint, sharing a blunt, or passing a bong. These old-school methods offer a unique social and communal experience that vaping simply can't capture.
One of the primary ways in which traditional methods of consuming medical marijuana differ from vaping is the social aspect. Smoking a joint or passing a bong is often a shared experience, with people coming together to enjoy the effects of marijuana and share in the experience. There is a sense of camaraderie and connection that comes with sharing a smoking device, which is difficult to replicate with vaping.
In addition to the social aspect, traditional methods of consuming medical marijuana also offer a different flavour and aroma profile. Vaping can alter the taste and smell of the marijuana, which may not be as appealing to some people as the natural flavours and aromas of traditional smoking methods. This can be especially important for people who use medical marijuana for its therapeutic effects, as the flavour and aroma of the plant can have a significant impact on the overall experience.
Furthermore, traditional methods of consuming medical marijuana allow for a greater degree of customization and control over the experience. With smoking methods, users can choose the strain, grind, and method of consumption to suit their preferences. This level of control and personalization is often not possible with vaping, which is a more standardized method of consumption.
In conclusion, while vaping may have advantages such as convenience and control over dosage, it simply can't capture the unique social and communal experience of traditional methods of consuming medical marijuana. Smoking a joint, sharing a blunt, or passing a bong offer a sense of connection and customization that vaping can't replicate. For those who value the social and sensory aspects of consuming medical marijuana, traditional smoking methods may be a better fit.
